Random Thoughts about the meta Cable lace cable design

This is not a complete design process; I just wanted to share a few of the things I thought about in designing meta Cable cable lace.

Turning the code grid into a cable design

This is the code grid I started with for this design. On the left is my original grid. For this kind of grid, I graph the numbers. This is cable in base four: 003 001 002 030 011. The columns go from 0-3 because those are the digits available in base four. I have them from right to left because that’s how my knitting goes; it’s all arbitrary anyway, and once it’s mirrored, it doesn’t matter. Anyway, each row of this grid is marked with the digit it represents, and they go in order from top to bottom.

On the right is the mirrored version of the code grid that I used to design the stitch pattern.

To make it work as cables, I divided each square of the grid into four squares before adding any cable symbols, because each 1/1 cable cross is two stitches wide.

I tend to consider the meandering lines of 1/1 cables as being similar to decrease lines in lace. This is in fact how I started occasionally using sporadic 1/1 cable crosses in my lace, so I could make some of my decrease lines work out better. (See Zaftig lace as an example.) Anyway, this means that when I’m presented with a possible cable chart that looks like the above, I want to work with it the way I do my decrease lines in lace. This is why I added all those 1/1 RPCs and LPCs, as well as changing some of the right crosses into left crosses to get the final complex chart.

There were some places I would have liked to have added some more cable lines (I’ve drawn them onto this photo), but to make it look good, I would have had to add some more regular 1/1 RCs and LCs without purls, which would have messed with the code, so I decided to leave those bits out.

Interlacing

One of the challenges of this kind of cable design is figuring out which direction a given cable cross should lean. The principle I use for doing this is to make it look as if a given strand of the cable is braided through the other strands in an over-under-over-under fashion. Sometimes this means that two crosses that look as if they should be mirrored need to go in the same direction.

Here I’ve traced the lines of the cable strands on the chart in a way that I hope illustrates this principle. This only applies when one of the colored lines crosses another. The cables in round 1 are both left-crosses, for instance, though the overall effect is of a mirrored pattern. However, in round 5, the outer two cables are both right crosses (one colored line crossing another) while the inner two are mirrored. The stitches in back at the mirrored crosses are considered to be part of the background texture, and the cable maneuver serves only to move the cable line from one column to another.

In round 21, the center RPC and LPC are part of the lace section; the cable lines in those stitches aren’t interlaced at any point, which is why they aren’t colored.